Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Luminous Details

Poet Ezra Pound apparently spent time on the lookout for what he called "luminous details." 


For him, these were "any small fact that casts light on larger realities". 


His poems are esoteric, strange, impenetrable even - but they often turn on the dizzying accumulation of many such particulars. 


These could be objects, words, persons, names, but they must have a certain quality that glows and pulsates with a life all their own.

 I find this to be a mesmerizing and joy-filled understanding of language and our world.


In other words, he could see enormous significance in the tiniest of details. 








Like yesterday, when I went out after the storm.



Cold lilac scents, damp sharp chill of fallen pine.



Bedraggled branches broken off for their unbelief. 
The sun fierce and sharp. 


Confetti petals in the street.



Puddle-mirrors back-illuminating the late afternoon.


Like it does in cities with canals, like Venice or Amsterdam. 


Pure light released on my eyes (almost) unmediated. 





Saturday, April 14, 2012

Some Things from Spring

An anything-but-comprehensive list of the delights of the past week, which is to say Spring Break.


 
Sunday. We are the Easter morning people. We expand the dining room table by two leaves to fit in family, then friends. Our first snips of chives spice up spring salads, and we try to figure out how many different meals we'll be able to make from the leftover eggs, ham, and fruit. (It turns out there are quite a few.) The feast moves out later to grilling in Minnetonka, with nieces ferreting out eggs impossibly-hid, blooms and sunshine everywhere, and a leisurely white wine on a sunny deck. 




 

Monday. In just two hours, Mom, little bro, and I combine our energies with a burly Lacrosse team from St. Thomas and pack up 95 boxes of food to Haiti. That's over 20,000 meals! Pray for the victims of the cholera epidemic; the situation is still quite grave. 



Tuesday. Cookies and cousins for breakfast. Delish.


Later, the art & food date with my mom-in-law, a.k.a. awesome friend.The Russian Art Museum instructs us in the post-Stalin release of artists to greater creativity, and we celebrate craftsmanship of another kind at Patisserie 46 with tasty French morsels. Miam, miam.


Wednesday. I lose my head and an entire morning to wisteria and sunshine. The perfume of blossoms on the trees out front combines with the musty pages of A Room with a View, and I am transported to early 20th-century Italy and the swoopy, swoony advenutres of a tidy young woman brought into contact with real  





Thursday. I bike all over creation on the bright green bikes and end up at the Midtown market to eat holy gyros of heroic proportions with the taller of the bros. What could be more luxurious than to waltz over on a shiny day to be with someone I just love to hang with?










Friday. Husband comes home from work and we take off for a new Belgian-French movie at the Edina Cinema, Le Gamin au vélo (The Boy with the bike). Breaks then warms the heart.


But who ever wants to stop there? 


Followed by a honest-to-golly jug band ("complete" with washboard, donkey jaw, tap dancer, and fife, among other things...) performing the late show at the Dakota. Como Avenue Jug Band, as generous as they are talented, and I get a free album. Sweet.

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Projects

I have always been a project person. My little brother used to say proj-deks. It makes me feel like a failure when I cast my eyes about looking at the myriad things I've begun and abandoned. But I'm starting (it's one of my projects) to get more comfortable with the unfinished.

It's funny, my students figured out that cras means tomorrow in Latin and is at the heart of procrastinator, but fortunately they haven't applied it to homework all that much. I cannot say the same. Let's see. A shifting pile of tests to correct. Tangles of yarn wrapped carelessly around some needles...there was a vision in there somewhere. That novel deep in the recesses of computer memory. Good thing machines and paper can hold our place for us. I keep incessant lists. Sometimes I scribble out the things I didn't get to on a given day, which is different (in my mind) from crossing out. That satisfying arrow shaft run straight through the heart of a task is reserved for those things I actually accomplished. I gave no idea when I began this scribble vs. crossing system. But what bothers me is that a good deal of these tasks are things I love to do. So why the negating? Maybe I need to add on to a list when things happen and watch it g r o w. Or move it from one side of the paper to the other. Or take the phrase bake bread, and rather than bake bread, bake bread! Exclamation point! Bread! In my kitchen! Eat! bread

Oh all these frayed edges. I try to tie up the loose ends at the end of each year, taking stock. Did I do what I set out to do? I heard a long time ago that successful people put themselves through these sorts of machinations: making goals, poring over lists, even mission statements, etc. And yet, what is more compelling to me lately is the fact that a great many people I admire thrive in that very tension of not-yet-completed. But who says unfinished means unsuccessful? Look at the "unfinished" symphony, "unfinished" poems, and extraordinary paintings displayed that are technically unfinished. Genius is often not vindicated in the lifetime of the un/fortunate bearer. We are all mere mortals, straining under the weight of a desire to make something immortal, and yet often end up passing it on to the next generation.

That was a bit grandiose. We're just talking about a loaf of bread here, or maybe a pastel drawing. Or are we?

My art teacher purposefully encourages us to have several projects going at once in order to keep fresh eyes and sane mind, which would probably not happen if you stared at the same graphite drawing for hours on end. By design, the creative life lives with a holy mess of works already-not-yet perfected.

Which gets me thinking: how am I any greater than my Lord, the One who began a good work in me? It is far from done, but He will be faithful to complete it until He comes back. Really, my life is one extended, unfinished project, projected far out there until only-He-knows-when. Someday. And that someday hangs upon those words which only He could say:

I
t is finished.

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Making Images


One of the biggest perks of my job is that the faculty are encouraged to keep learning, growing, and thinking. This objective is fulfilled by a great many things on the gritty, daily level and also in terms of soaring mission and vision. Near the end of last semester, I shyly sidled up to one of the art teachers and explained that I've always liked drawing and painting and would like to deepen my skills. With sharp eyes and warm smile, she responded with a hearty invitation to attend her class the next semester. Most of us have two hours carved out of the six-hour day as preparation time, and I would trade in one of those to sit in the large-windowed art room with eighth grade girls once a day, surrounded by the comfortable smells of acrylics, charcoal, and hard work.

As it happens, spending an hour a day staring at things - well, changes your eyes. And if you're like me, it makes you think about how those changes affect the person, the human being. What if my eyes, in turn, change the world? What does it mean to look at a thing and copy it? Are there moral implications to the way I crouch over a piece of paper and scratch a piece of charcoal over it? If this seems overly thoughtful, I am not the first one to find this process worrisome. We are told that the Israelites, for example, received the following command:

"You shall not make yourselves a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them for I the Lord am a jealous god." (Exodus 20:4)

Similar (though not identical) preoccupations haunt Plato's Republic. My senior high students and I are read about the philosopher's uneasiness with the way that art imitates real things. His argument is based on different reasoning than that of the second commandment. Plato thinks that this world (trees, people, etc.) are already a copy of the True Reality (or Forms), so copying them again through art makes them even weaker, like when you make a photocopy of a photocopy and the quality diminishes. The Lord God, by contrast, is Reality, and so is His creation all around us, but He does not want us putting those two realities on equal footing in terms of worship. Either way, it seems as if art is anything but a neutral activity.

I bend over a piece and scribble in the bus, trying heard to make the peel of the orange "pop out" from the rest of the drawing, when a gentleman asks if I am an art student. I respond with a half-smile - "in a manner of speaking". He looks at what I am doing, copying from a magazine cutout, and says: "That's cheating." My eyebrows heighten. "Oh?" "You're going from a two-dimensional source to a two-dimensional drawing. The real thing is to copy from a three-dimensioned thing." I mumble something about how we do still-lifes in class, but inside my head the wheels are turning. Cheating - why does he think that? Rather than offended, I'm fascinated by his reasoning. Like Socrates, is he saying that if you copy from a copy from a copy from a copy-?

But sir, every student starts with this. Copying. And doing so changes your eyes.

Last Sunday, I noticed the carpet in church for the first time in eleven-some years. It is a grid pattern, made to look like swaths of woven strips. The color is a deep grayish purple. I listen to the sermon and imagine how I could blend that color with poppy red, indigo blue and white. The details in wood grain, and shapes of shadows, and the lines that define someone's face all leap out at me as details that my usual, big-picture take on life would normally gloss over. You know how most humans read - they see the first and last letters of a word and the brain deduces the rest. I normally do that with everything. It's an integrated, cosmic way to look at life, but it is good to learn how to be a careful observer, too.

In that vein, I have been appreciating the wise words and life of Jean-Henri Fabre, the French entomologist and writer. I came across a collection of his writings in a thrift shop this week. This man led a deeply-observant life, deliberately confining himself to his home in Provence during the final 40 years of his life. Weary of the dry, dead specimens in the laboratories that had marked the first part of his career, he chose a spot where he could be surrounded by the living, buzzing flora and fauna of his neighborhood. He writes to an imagined group of former colleagues:

"You rip up the animal and I study it alive; you turn it into an object of horror and pity, whereas I cause it to be loved; you labor in a torture chamber and dissecting room, I make my observations under the blue sky to the song of the Cicadas, you subject cell and protoplasm to chemical tests, I study instinct in its loftiest manifestations; you pry into death, I pry into life." (5, The Passionate Observer, italics mine).

Some would argue that to hide oneself away and study only the forms of life located in one's backyard is tragically provincial. However, his voluminous writings - both delightful to read and scientifically well-respected - confirm that careful, minuscule considerations of the reality that immediately surround us can be of utmost importance.

Back in the art room, I turn the paper upside-down to change the perspective, to get a fresh look. But I'm still wondering. When I create a picture - whether it be in the deliberate arrangement of words that make up this blog post or with the strokes of a pencil that somehow call to mind a sleeping woman at a table - what am I doing, exactly?

It is a heady thought, yet inescapable: like my Creator, I create. Does this sound presumptuous, especially given the stern Exodus warning? Here is mystery, but a sure thing. To make images is to participate in the divine nature. First we observe and we see what God has made. Leaves, noses, insects, mountains, color, shape. Then comes the remarkable leap. As Christ said of himself, we "do what we see our Father doing." To copy things is not to reduce them, like Plato said. Rather, we bring the Creator glory; like all symbols, our rendition points to His handiwork. Or, as Mark Noll writes: "for believers to be studying created things is to be studying the works of Christ" (Jesus Christ and the Life of the Mind). I would add that for believers to study and copy His masterpieces is to be an apprentice to him and share in his labor. Perhaps we can become more like the students of the great painters, our words and deeds bearing the name of our Master's workshop and not our own.

Sunday, January 01, 2012

Loca-Voracious

There was something about this past year that brought what was near more into focus, and let the stunning faraways remain a pleasant blur for a while. What is this place called home, and what is our needful commitment to it as humans? Annie Dillard's words come to mind. We are here on earth to "explore the neighborhood, view the landscape, to discover at least where it is that have been so startlingly set down, if we can't learn why"(Pilgrim at Tinker Creek). Fill the earth and have dominion...and what about my particular corner of the world?

One of the ways to keep yourself to the neighborhood is to accept limits. This kind of discipline is unfashionable, but one wonders if an occasional fast from the frenzied travel so popular in our time might be good for the soul. The Amish seem to think so, not accepting any technology that pushes them beyond the reach of their own arms and feet. We are far from bonnets and hand plows in downtown Minneapolis (though horse-drawn carriages do meander through Loring Park at time). Still, our chosen means of transportation this year really did circumscribe our pathways to keep to the local. We exchanged international flights for buses and bikes, continental high-speed trains for the occasional car trip. We barely crossed state lines (thank you, Wisconsin) and what was the result?

A teensy bit of adjustment. "Oh my word, can you believe we haven't boarded a plane in six months?" Mild twinges of jealousy while eying passengers of the light rail with large suitcases, obviously headed for an airline terminal and some other magical place. Gratitude does not come easy to us humans, but practice does help. Once we quieted ourselves, took a deep breath, and looked 'round about for contentment - well.

There is a veritable feast of beauty in Minnesota and its environs. We climbed over rugged rocks, ruddy with ore lines along Superior's North Shore, striking color against that vast, wild stretch of tumultuous blue. That lake is never the same exact hue two glimpses in a row - you can swing around once, train your eyes upon it again, and it will have changed. (Try it next time. )

Everywhere you turn in this land there are mirror pools upon the tens of thousands, reflecting city and forest by turns, souvenirs from the glaciers' laborious, behemoth voyage over the earth so many millennia ago. And the southern edges of the state that were somehow missed by those massive patches of ancient ice, leaving dizzying river-bluff
drops. It was a lazy summer afternoon in July, floating in an inner tube on that winding, green strip of water, looking up for eagles and down for agates. Not far from there, vintners try to capture the cool, wild mineral flavor of our native homeland in bottles, with increasing (surprising!) success.

Maybe Minnesota has a sense of terroir after all.

I've been reading lately about how other people think about a sense of place. Wendell Berry, the farmer and essayist, manages to be sharply critical and warmly endearing all at once. He writes in Life is a Miracle: An Essay Against Modern Superstition (2000):

"The standards of our behavior must be derived, not from the capability of technology, but from the nature of places and and communities. We must shift the priority from production to local adaptation, from innovation to familiarity, from power to elegance, from costliness to thrift. We must learn to think about propriety in scale and design, as determined by human and ecological health. By such changes we might again make our work an answer to despair" (12, italics mine).

This is timely advice for a whole constellation of societies facing enormous odds economically. It is also timeless, I think. Technology is not a despicable thing by any means (bikes and books are technologies just as much as cars and Kindles are). But writers like Berry push us to carefully consider how the innovations presented to us might change our ways of thinking and dependence, and how they might cause us to reach beyond what is our proper realm and manner of dominion in God's world. I like that...even as I find his words massively challenging.

Another writer who has approached this question of limits from a culinary and personal point of view is Barbara Kingsolver, in Animal Vegetable, Miracle (2007), an enjoyable account of her family's adventure of eating only local for a year on their farm in Appalachia. She writes with conviction, but balanced with enough self-deprecation and realism to make her less preachy and than some (shrill organa-crusader Joan Gussow comes to mind). Kingsolver takes obvious, lavish delight in creating meals that are faithful to her specific patch of ground. It was a sorely-needed reminder for me to turn my attentions again to the significant gratification of making home, whether baking bread, selecting local squash for a soup, or carefully setting the table. The closer we are to the labor that we partake in ourselves, the less separated we feel from the product and the greater our satisfaction. (It's about the only thing Marx and I can agree on.) Moreover, it's all gifts from above: the ability to work, the pleasure in consuming, the sharing with our neighborhood, the wise rule of creation.

David wrote in the psalms to "trust in the Lord, and do good. Dwell in the land and feed on faithfulness." (37:3) I expect as long as we keep our eyes and mouths wide open, they'll be full to the brim, with everything from bread to beauty, abroad or in the backyard. Yum.

Saturday, October 01, 2011

Wonder-Full

I devote the darting, winding hours of each day to the pursuit of that which is true, beautiful and good in this world. I lead students to do the same. "I am all wonder" as Odysseus said, gazing at the intricate dance-steps and whirling color in the palace of his hospitable hosts in Phaiakia. How extraordinary that in our exceedingly imperfect world with all of its pain and evil that we even can perceive as much the former glory of creation as we do. Ruins as they are, they stand in towering, majestic
memory of what it once was - and will again be one day.

As humans, we are a microcosm of the fallen and glorious. We are absurd and inexplicable (or downright evil) one moment; capable of great sacrificial, heroic love the next. (See Carnegie Hero Fund for some examples, or recall Flight 93.) We are the being-restored, if we accept Him Who makes all things new. I snap and lord my pride over another created one. I repent in the dust that I am. Thanks be to God who leads us in His triumph. I love again, and (hopefully) better. Daily the prayer, forgive our trespasses, as we forgive those who have trespassed against us. Groaning inward, we wait for the redemption of our bodies in full.

Whether glimpsed in the immensity of creation, or tracked in individual human stories, I have always been amazed by extent to which we are granted grace to see truth, beauty, and goodness. It might take long, patient hours of study - but it is all around us. Speaking about working with Terence Malik on his film Tree of Life, Brad Pitt reportedly said: "He’s like a guy with a butterfly net waiting for the truth to go by.” He seems to expect that kind of patience from his audience as well, and we do not live in an age given to careful and deliberate consideration.
The stunning images of his movie originally stretched over six hours, but he cut it down to a (mere) 139 minutes. This glory-seeing takes a long-staying eye. Though a masterpiece in terms of this kind of deliberate gazing, Tree of Life was booed at Cannes, and many people have walked straight out of the theater.

Whether glimpsing good or reckoning with evil, in the wide world or within myself, I have been given an opportunity to spend the lion's share of my days doing just this. I awake early and
bike to the bus stop with stars above my head (Is that Jupiter? I should ask the physics teacher later...) On the bus, I pull out an article on the sacraments in the church and their aesthetic meaning, which my colleague has asked me to help him translate from French to English (Now, what did Aquinas mean by that? Huh..) Once at school, I pull out Homer's Odyssey and carefully re-consider how to tease and guide the conversation for the first two hours of discussion with my juniors (Would a 16-year-old girl connect with what he's saying here about longing for home? How can I get her to feel this?) Onto the whirlwind of lunch and monitoring, which really means I just get to play chess with junior-high boys and talk about the Vikings (The people group, not the football team, believe it or not).

The rest of the afternoon I swim happily through languages: senior French class and wide-eyed seventh-grade Latin and pretty soon I plop myself in my chair in the faculty room and think about how to prepare for tomorrow. I don't get very far, however. The mind-bending conversation - it might be about prairie grasses, music theory and math, or epistemology (how do we know what we know?) - but it's always something.

Wonder-full.